Calculations for PERT and CPM are not particularly difficult-they require no more than simple arithmetic. They can get lengthy and sometimes convoluted, especially since CPM requires frequent recalculation. So, while it can be done with pencil and paper, frequently it is done with the aid of computers-simple spreadsheets, or even dedicated application programs like Microsoft Project.
When calculating PERT and CPM without a dedicated application program, it is best to approach it in a stepwise process (Krueckeberg & Silvers, 1974, pp. 231-255).
A typical PERT table might have the following structure:
Activity |
Beginning |
Ending |
a |
m |
b |
expected |
sd |
Foundatn |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
.33 |
Frame |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
.83 |
A typical CPM table might have the following structure:
Activty |
Beg. |
End |
Time-Crash |
Time-Norml |
Cost-Crash |
Cost-Norml |
Time Saved |
Cost Increas |
Cost / Week |
Fdn |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4000 |
3000 |
1 |
1000 |
1000 |
Frame |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
8000 |
4000 |
3 |
4000 |
1333 |
In addition to tabular data, both CPM and PERT will generally include a graphic presentation of the network of activities, usually with the length of each activity (in time) indicated and the critical path marked distinctively.
© 1996 A.J.Filipovitch
Revised 11 March 2005